What works? A qualitative exploration of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander healing programs that respond to family violence

End date
Research partner(s)
Macquarie University

This report presents findings from a research project that aimed to determine “what works” in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander healing programs across the nation that respond to family violence, as perceived and experienced by the people who deliver, utilise and are impacted by such programs. It also aimed to specifically investigate the availability of such programs for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander LGBTQIASB+ people and those with disability. In addition, it included a focus on how such programs engage with clients when person-to-person contact is not possible, particularly in light of situations like the COVID-19 pandemic which occurred during the implementation of this project. The premise of the project is that family violence in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities is a result of colonialism, that healing responses are a key approach to addressing family violence, and that such responses should target those who have perpetrated family violence as well as those who have experienced it.

 

Output(s)

What works? A qualitative exploration of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander healing programs that respond to family violence
Type
Report
Authors
Carlson, B., Day, M., & Farrelly, T.
Publisher
ANROWS
Publication date
Rights notice
©ANROWS 2024 With the exception of the ANROWS branding, content provided by third parties, and any material protected by a trademark, all material presented in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 3.0 Australia (CC BY-NC 3.0 AU) licence. The full licence terms are available at creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/au/legalcode

The quality of ANROWS publications is ensured through a rigorous peer-review process that is consistent with the principles of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) Ethical Guidelines for Peer Review. This report has been assessed by at least two peer reviewers with relevant academic expertise